Fontenot

Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Bad Law
129 Cal. Rptr. 3d 467·198 Cal. App. 4th 256·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1059
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 11, 2011No. A130478California7,737 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Margulies, J.

Plaintiff Arlene Fontenot sued Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), and three other entities after she defaulted on a secured real estate loan and lost the property to foreclosure. In the fourth amended complaint, plaintiff alleged the foreclosure was unlawful because Wells Fargo had breached an agreement to forbear from foreclosure, and MERS made an invalid assignment of an interest in the promissory note relating to the property. Wells Fargo and MERS filed demurrers, based in part on recorded documents they contended demonstrated plaintiff’s claims to be without factual foundation. The trial court took judicial notice of the requested documents and sustained the demurrers without leave to amend. We affirm.

L BACKGROUND

On April 30, 2010, plaintiff filed her fourth amended complaint (complaint) against Wells Fargo, MERS, and three other defendants. 1 The complaint alleged that in 2006, plaintiff gave defendant Alliance Bancorp a $1 million promissory note, secured by a deed of trust in the purchased real property (property). MERS was identified as the “nominee” of the lender in the deed of trust. In November 2007,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.