Keister

People v. Keister

Bad Law
129 Cal. Rptr. 3d 566·198 Cal. App. 4th 442·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1071
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 15, 2011No. C065219California3,212 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Robie, J.

Over a two-year period, defendant Randal Scott Keister molested K., the teenage daughter of his girlfriend, and left sexually explicit writings and objects in K.’s bedroom. A jury found him guilty of four counts of committing a lewd act on a child, one count of battery, and eight counts of contacting or communicating with a minor with the intent to commit an enumerated sex offense (Pen. Code, 1 § 288.3, subd. (a)).

Section 288.3, subdivision (a) reads as follows: “Every person who contacts or communicates with a minor, or attempts to contact or communicate with a minor, who knows or reasonably should know that the person is a minor, with intent to commit an offense specified in Section 207, 209, 261, 264.1, 273a, 286, 288, 288a, 288.2, 289, 311.1, 311.2, 311.4 or 311.11 involving the minor shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for the term prescribed for an attempt to commit the intended offense.”

Defendant appeals, raising five constitutional challenges to section 288.3 (including one to the proposition that contains the section) and an argument regarding what he believes is a lesser included offense of section 288.3. Finding no merit in these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.