Prentis-Margulis

Prentis-Margulis v. Margulis

Good Law
198 Cal. App. 4th 1252
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 11, 2011No. G041948California11,883 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aronson, J.

In a marital dissolution proceeding to divide the community property, where the nonmanaging spouse offers prima facie evidence that community assets of a certain value have disappeared while in the control of the managing spouse postseparation, 1 should the managing spouse have the burden of proof to account for the missing assets? The answer is yes.

Husband and wife separated after a 33-year marriage and, for 12 postseparation years, continued to handle their joint finances as before: Husband had complete control of substantial community investment accounts and paid all the bills; wife trusted him to manage their finances for their mutual benefit. Just before trial, however, husband disclosed for the first time that the once-brimming investment accounts were virtually empty. Without any corroborating evidence, he attributed the dissipation of account values to proper expenditures and stock market losses.

At trial, wife argued the court should charge husband with the missing funds unless he proved he did not misappropriate the money. Her only evidence, of missing funds was a financial statement husband prepared three years after separation and nine years before trial.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.