Quiroz

People v. Quiroz

Good Law
131 Cal. Rptr. 3d 925·199 Cal. App. 4th 1123·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1268
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 6, 2011No. E051131California1,885 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hollenhorst, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Zachary Joseph Quiroz appeals from his conviction of burglary of a vehicle. (Pen. Code, 1 § 459.) He contends the probation condition requiring him to “[s]ubmit a record of income and expenditures to the Probation Officer as directed” is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad and is unauthorized by statute. We disagree, and we affirm.

H. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant was charged in a complaint with three counts of burglary of a vehicle. (§ 459.) On May 17, 2010, he pleaded guilty to one count, and the other two counts were dismissed.

The parties stipulated that the police reports in the court file could serve as the factual basis for the plea. The police reports state that on May 5 and 6, 2010, defendant burglarized at least three vehicles. He broke windows of two of the vehicles to gain entry. He stole items from the vehicles, including baseball bats and gear, two purses, a camera, and a Bible. When defendant was arrested in the area of the third burglary, stolen property from all three vehicles was found in his vehicle. Defendant admitted the burglaries after being given Miranda 2 warnings.

*1127 The trial court granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.