First Bank v. East West Bank

Good Law
132 Cal. Rptr. 3d 267·199 Cal. App. 4th 1309·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1306
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 17, 2011No. B226061California4,065 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aldrich, J.

INTRODUCTION

In this case we hold, where two deeds of trust secured by the same real property were simultaneously time-stamped for recording by the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office but were indexed at different times, that the lenders have equal priority. One of the lenders, defendant East West Bank, appeals from the judgment of the trial court declaring that the two trust deeds have equal priority. Defendant contends, as its trust deed was indexed first, that its lien has a prior right. We conclude the other lender, plaintiff First Bank, demonstrated in its summary judgment motion indisputably that, pursuant to its practice, the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office time-stamped both trust deeds at issue at 8:00 a.m. on September 4, 2008. Hence, neither deed of trust was first duly recorded and neither bank was a subsequent purchaser. (Civ. Code, §§ 1107, 1214.) As a matter of law, therefore, the trust deeds have equal priority. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2008, plaintiff and defendant granted loans to Kyung Ha Chung and secured them with the same real property located in South Gate, California. Chung signed both trust…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.