McDonald

McDonald v. Cornelius

Good Law
132 Cal. Rptr. 3d 922·200 Cal. App. 4th 1198
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2011No. A131495California3,202 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sepulveda, J.

A daughter petitioned for temporary and permanent conservatorship of her elderly father upon allegations that he was not receiving adequate nutrition, hygiene, and medication, individuals living with the father were financially abusing him, and those individuals were conducting illegal activity on the premises. An investigator appointed by the court substantiated the allegations and the court established a temporary conservatorship that lasted six months. A court-appointed attorney reported that the temporary conservatorship improved the conservatee’s situation but the father strenuously objected to the conservatorship. The daughter dismissed her petition for a permanent conservatorship. The court awarded compensation and reimbursement of expenses to the temporary conservator and her attorneys, to be paid from the conservatee’s estate. The conservatee appeals the award.

The conservatee claims that Probate Code sections 2641 and 2642 authorizing payments to a conservator and the conservator’s attorneys do not apply where there was only a temporary conservatorship, never a permanent conservatorship. The conservatee also claims that, even if a temporary conservator may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.