Davis-Miller

Davis-Miller v. Automobile Club of Southern California

Good Law
134 Cal. Rptr. 3d 551·201 Cal. App. 4th 106
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 26, 2011No. B224318; No. B224320California7,044 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Croskey, J.

In this matter, we have consolidated two appeals. Both arise from the denial of plaintiffs’ motions for class certification. In the first, plaintiffs and appellants Paul Martin Davis-Miller (Davis-Miller), 1 Barbara L. Keeler (Keeler), Mickey Michel (Michel) and Howard R. Miller (Miller) (together, the Davis-Miller plaintiffs) appeal from an order denying their motion for class certification in their action against defendant and respondent Automobile Club of Southern California (Auto Club). In their complaint, these plaintiffs alleged violations of the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.; henceforth UCL), 2 negligent misrepresentation and omission, intentional misrepresentation and omission, fraud and unjust enrichment in connection with respondent’s operation of a roadside battery service program that provides jump-starts and sells and installs batteries for stranded motorists.

In the second appeal, plaintiff and appellant Amy Reed (Reed) seeks to reverse an order denying her motion for class certification in her action against the same defendant and respondent. However, Reed’s complaint alleged violations of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.