People v. Clark

Bad Law
136 Cal. Rptr. 3d 10·201 Cal. App. 4th 235·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1488
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 29, 2011No. C064590California7,051 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Murray, J.

A jury found defendant not guilty of the assault with a deadly weapon of his wife (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)) 1 and not guilty of the assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury of his 14-year-old son (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)), but found him guilty of the lesser included misdemeanor offense of the simple assault (§ 240) of both his wife and son. The jury also found defendant guilty of the felony child abuse (§ 273a, subd. (a)) of his son. Defendant admitted serving a prior prison term. (§ 667.5, subd. (b).)

The trial court sentenced defendant to state prison for the felony child abuse and recidivist enhancement. It later imposed a concurrent term for the assault of his wife and a stayed concurrent term for the assault of his son. It also entered a no-visitation order with respect to defendant’s son under the authority of section 1202.05.

*239 On appeal, defendant asserts the following: (1) the evidence supporting his conviction for felony child abuse is insufficient to establish that the circumstances were likely to cause great bodily injury, or that defendant acted with criminal negligence; (2) the trial court erred by failing to instruct on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.