Witcraft

People v. Witcraft

Good Law
201 Cal. App. 4th 659
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 6, 2011No. H036159California6,111 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rushing, J.

I. Statement of the Case

Defendant David Lynn Witcraft pleaded no contest to causing a false or fraudulent insurance claim to be filed. (Pen. Code, § 550, subd. (a)(1).) 1 On appeal from the judgment, he claims defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to renew a motion to dismiss the charge.

Defendant also filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he raises the same claim. We ordered that the petition be considered with the appeal, and we shall resolve both the appeal and petition in this decision.

We affirm the judgment on appeal. However, we issue an order for the Attorney General to show cause why defendant is not entitled to relief on habeas corpus.

II. Facts and Procedural History

On February 5, 2009, defendant was driving a white Ford Ranger pickup truck when he rear-ended Mary Jo Greenlee, injuring her and damaging her *663 Mercedes. Defendant gave his insurance information to Mrs. Greenlee. Officer Manual Ochoa of the San Jose Police Department responded to a call about the accident. He noted defendant’s license plate, which had a current registration sticker, and asked for defendant’s driver’s license, registration, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.