Allende

Allende v. Department of the California Highway Patrol

Good Law
134 Cal. Rptr. 3d 26·201 Cal. App. 4th 1006·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1541
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 9, 2011No. A130469California6,596 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pollak, J.

The Department of the California Highway Patrol (CHP) appeals from a judgment declaring invalid and enjoining enforcement of certain provisions of its policy for recovering emergency response costs from persons causing incidents while driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. We conclude that the CHP’s policy is not inconsistent with the language or purpose of the authorizing legislation, Government Code section 53150 et seq. 1 and, therefore, shall reverse the judgment.

Background

In this court’s decision reviewing an earlier order in this litigation, we summarized: “Sections 53150 through 53159 establish the statutory framework allowing public agencies to recover emergency response expenses from persons who intentionally or negligently cause incidents requiring an emergency response. Section 53150 defines the circumstances under which a person driving a motor vehicle may be liable for the expense of an emergency response, and section 53156, subdivision (a) . . . defines ‘expense of an emergency response.’ ” (California Highway Patrol v. Superior Court (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 488, 497 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.3d 16 ] (Allende I).)

This action began in November 2003 when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.