Pirjada

Pirjada v. Superior Court

Good Law
134 Cal. Rptr. 3d 74·201 Cal. App. 4th 1074·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1547
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 2011No. B234813California5,008 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Perluss, J.

Putative class representative Obaidul H. Pirjada filed a complaint on behalf of himself and a proposed class of all security guards who had been employed in California by Pacific National Security, Inc. (Pacific National), during the immediately preceding four years, asserting causes of action for failure to provide meal and rest periods and various other wage-and-hour claims, as well as a claim for unfair business practices. After Pirjada settled his individual claim through direct negotiations with Pacific National’s chief executive officer, respondent superior court granted Pirjada’s counsel leave to amend the complaint to name a new class representative but denied his motion to compel precertification discovery to identify a suitable class representative. Counsel for Pirjada, purportedly on behalf of his client, has petitioned for a writ of mandate challenging the order denying discovery. We deny the petition and vacate the previously ordered stay of the order to show cause regarding dismissal, which may proceed pursuant to the requirements of La Sala v. American Sav. & Loan Assn. (1971) 5 Cal.3d 864 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 849 , 489 P.2d 1113 ] (La Sala), Kagan v. Gibraltar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.