Collins

Collins v. eMachines, Inc.

Good Law
134 Cal. Rptr. 3d 588·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1626·202 Cal. App. 4th 249
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 28, 2011No. C066092California3,407 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Butz, J.

In this class action alleging a failure to disclose a computer defect involving a microchip that controlled floppy disk data transmission, plaintiffs Tammy Collins and Rudolph Roma appeal from a judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiffs have alleged counts under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.), the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 17200, 17500 et seq.), common law fraud, and unjust enrichment.

We conclude the trial court erroneously granted judgment on the pleadings without leave to amend, and we shall reverse on all counts except unjust enrichment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Because we are reviewing a successful motion for judgment on the pleadings, and there are no pertinent judicially noticeable facts to consider, our review is confined to the complaint. (DiPirro v. American Isuzu Motors, Inc. (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 966, 972 [ 14 Cal.Rptr.3d 787 ] (DiPirro).) We consider independently whether the complaint states a cause of action, accepting as true all allegations of material fact but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. (Ibid.) “Where, as here, leave to amend was not granted, we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.