Alvarez

Alvarez v. Brookstone Co.

Good Law
135 Cal. Rptr. 3d 777·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1654·202 Cal. App. 4th 1023
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 2011No. D057567California3,137 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McDonald, J.

Plaintiff Alexandra M. Alvarez appeals a judgment entered after the trial court sustained the demurrer filed by defendant Brookstone Company, Inc. (Brookstone), to her complaint that alleged a violation of Civil Code 1 section 1747.08 for requesting and recording her ZIP Code as part of a credit card transaction. On appeal, Alvarez contends that because Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 524 [ 120 Cal.Rptr.3d 531 , 246 P.3d 612 ] (Pineda) held that conduct violates section 1747.08, the judgment against her must be reversed. Brookstone concedes Pineda held the conduct violates section 1747.08, but argues Pineda’s holding should not be applied retrospectively to its conduct and therefore the judgment should be affirmed. We conclude Pineda should be applied retrospectively and reverse the judgment to the extent it dismissed the section 1747.08 claim.

*1026 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Because we are reviewing the trial court’s order sustaining Brookstone’s demurrer, we assume as tme all facts alleged in Alvarez’s complaint. (Pineda, supra, 51 Cal.4th at p. 528 .)

On December 10, 2008, Alvarez filed a putative class action complaint, alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.