Marken

Marken v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District

Bad Law
136 Cal. Rptr. 3d 395·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 47·202 Cal. App. 4th 1250·33 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 506·40 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1402
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 2012No. B231787California11,551 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Perluss, J.

After an investigation of a student’s complaint Ari Marken, a mathematics teacher at Santa Monica High School, received a written reprimand from the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (District) for violating the District’s policy prohibiting the sexual harassment of students. Marken had been placed on administrative leave during the month-long investigation, but returned to his classroom following the reprimand.

*1255 Two years later Michael Chwe, a District parent, requested disclosure under the California Public Records Act (CPRA) (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.) 1 of records concerning the District’s investigation of Marken and its findings he had violated the sexual harassment policy. Advised by the District it intended to release certain of the records (specifically, the investigation report and letter of reprimand), Marken filed a verified complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief/petition for writ of mandate, alleging disclosure of his personnel records was not authorized under the CPRA and would violate his constitutional and statutory rights of privacy. After initially issuing a temporary restraining order, the trial court denied Marken’s request for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.