Vitkievicz

Vitkievicz v. Valverde

Good Law
136 Cal. Rptr. 3d 448·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 54·202 Cal. App. 4th 1306
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 2012No. B229605California2,533 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Croskey, J.

Michael John Vitkievicz challenges an administrative decision by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) temporarily revoking his privilege to operate a motor vehicle. He appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of mandate after the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend. He contends the sustaining of the demurrer based on the statute of limitations was error because he timely filed his petition within 95 days after the mailing of notice of the final administrative decision, and the DMV waived the statute of limitations defense by failing to timely demur. We conclude that the sustaining of the demurrer was proper and will affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. Factual Background

Vitkievicz was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol in October 2009. The sheriff’s deputy making the arrest served him with an order temporarily revoking his privilege to operate a motor vehicle effective after 30 days. Vitkievicz requested an administrative hearing. The DMV conducted an administrative hearing resulting in a decision revoking his driving privilege for a two-year period. The DMV later affirmed the decision in an administrative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.