Lane

Lane v. Valverde

Bad Law
136 Cal. Rptr. 3d 623·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 87·203 Cal. App. 4th 71·2012 WL 280733
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2012No. F061775California2,466 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Franson, J.

INTRODUCTION

This case involves interpreting a provision of the California Code of Regulations pertaining to procedures used in the breath-alcohol analysis of persons suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of Vehicle Code sections 23152 or 23153. California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 1221.4, includes required procedures for determining the accuracy of instruments used in breath-alcohol testing. These procedures include a “periodic analysis of a reference sample of known alcohol concentration” (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 17, § 1221.4, subd. (a)(2)(A)) to be conducted in a specified manner. Subdivision (a)(2)(B) of California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 1221.4, provides that “[f]or the purposes of such determinations of accuracy, ‘periodic’ means either a period of time not exceeding 10 days or following the testing of every 150 subjects, whichever comes sooner.”

*74 In this case respondent Paul Allen Lane (Lane) underwent a breath-alcohol analysis less than five hours after the testing instrument, known as an “Alcotest 7410,” was determined to be accurate in an analysis of a “reference sample” done on January 2, 2010. Lane’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.