Maaso

Maaso v. Signer

Bad Law
136 Cal. Rptr. 3d 853·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 112·203 Cal. App. 4th 362·2012 WL 375324
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 2012No. B228314California6,897 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Todd, J.

*366 Opinion

Per A. Maaso, by and through his guardian ad litem, George Richard Martin, sued Stephen Signer, M.D., for medical malpractice. The case was ordered to binding contractual arbitration before a panel of three arbitrators. Two of the three arbitrators found that Maaso failed to prove causation, and an arbitration award was issued in favor of Signer. The trial court vacated the award on the ground that it was procured by “undue means,” based on ex parte contact between Signer’s party arbitrator and the neutral arbitrator while the award was pending, and ordered the case back to arbitration before a different neutral arbitrator. The second arbitration resulted in a monetary award in favor of Maaso. The award exceeded an offer to compromise pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 (section 998) made by Maaso, and rejected by Signer, prior to the first arbitration.

On appeal, Maaso contends the trial court erred in denying him costs under section 998 and prejudgment interest under Civil Code section 3291 (section 3291) as the prevailing party in the second arbitration. In his cross-appeal, Signer contends the trial court erred in vacating the original arbitration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.