Bates v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, Inc.

Good Law
138 Cal. Rptr. 3d 680·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 279·204 Cal. App. 4th 210
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 2012No. B232731California4,751 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Manella, J.

—Appellant Katherine Lee Bates contends the trial court erred in awarding costs to a defendant sued under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 15600 et seq.; the Elder Protection Act) and abused its discretion in concluding that an offer to settle pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 by that defendant— respondent Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, Inc.—was reasonable and made in good faith. 1 She further contends that neither fees paid to an undesignated expert nor expert witness costs incurred prior to the section 998 offer were recoverable. For the reasons discussed, we disagree. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Complaint

In December 2007, appellant, acting as the administrator of the estate of Rinda Lou Bates, brought suit against respondent and several others for injuries suffered by Rinda prior to her death. 2 Appellant alleged that on October 1, 2006, after suffering a broken hip, Rinda was admitted to Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, a hospital owned and operated by *214 respondent, where she underwent surgery and physical therapy. 3 On October 20,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.