People v. International Fidelity Insurance

Bad Law
138 Cal. Rptr. 3d 883·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 335·204 Cal. App. 4th 588
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 21, 2012No. F061451California2,613 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dawson, J.

—A surety on a bail bond is appealing an order denying its motion to set aside summary judgment, to discharge forfeiture, and to exonerate the bond. The surety contends its $65,000 bond was void. The People disagree. We agree with the surety and accordingly reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On November 25, 2008, Bankers Insurance Company (Bankers) posted a $35,000 bond for the release of Jose Juan Enriquez from custody in Kings Superior Court case No. 10C0299.

On August 25, 2009, at a court appearance at which Enriquez was present, a deputy district attorney informed the court that Enriquez had outstanding warrants in four other driving under the influence cases and requested that Enriquez be remanded to custody in case No. 10C0299. The trial court continued the case until September 1, 2009, asked that the other cases be pulled for the hearing on that date, and remanded Enriquez to the custody of the sheriff. The court stated: “Bail is going to be set at this time at $100,000.” Subsequently, the court stated, “He does have a bail bond in this matter. How much is the bail bond—$35,000. I’ll allow the $35,000 to remain. The additional amount is $65,000.” The deputy district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.