Duea

Duea v. County of San Diego

Good Law
138 Cal. Rptr. 3d 766·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 350·204 Cal. App. 4th 691
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 2012No. D058333California4,129 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Benke, J.

—Article XIIIA of the California Constitution (article XIII A), adopted by voters in 1978 as Proposition 13, limits the ad valorem tax on real property to 1 percent of the property’s “full cash value.” (Art. XUI A, § 1, subd. (a).) The term “full cash value” means the “county assessor’s valuation of real property as shown on the 1975-76 tax bill,” or, as relevant here, “thereafter, the appraised value of real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975 assessment.” (Id., § 2, subd. (a), italics added.)

As also relevant here, on a change of ownership the property is reassessed at a new base year value (e.g., revalued at current fair market value) as of the date of the transfer. (Art. XIII A, § 1, subd. (a); see also Rev. & Tax. Code, 1 § 110.1, subd. (a)(2) [“For purposes of subdivision (a) of Section 2 of Article XIIIA , ‘full cash value’ of real property . . . means the fair market value as determined pursuant to Section 110 ... : ['[[] . . . [f] (2) [f]or property which . . . changes ownership after the 1975 lien date . . . .”].)

*694 The California Constitution exempts certain transfers that otherwise would be a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.