Allexy

People v. Allexy

Good Law
139 Cal. Rptr. 3d 723·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 421·204 Cal. App. 4th 1358·2012 WL 1263500
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 16, 2012No. C066883California1,487 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Robie, J.

—In this opinion we explain the procedure a trial court must follow if it chooses to impose sex offender registration on a defendant whose crime does not require registration.

The law allows a court to impose sex offender registration “if the court finds at the time of conviction or sentencing that the person committed the offense as a result of sexual compulsion or for purposes of sexual gratification. . . .” (Pen. Code, 1 § 290.006, italics added.)

Here, defendant pled guilty to child endangerment, the trial court imposed sentence but suspended execution of that sentence, placed her on probation, and told her if she violated that probation, it would order her to register as a sex offender. She violated probation and the court then ordered her to register.

The procedure the trial court followed was wrong. It failed to decide at the time it imposed sentence whether defendant would have to register. If a trial court wants to use the specter of sex offender registration as a basis for encouraging a defendant to comply with the terms of probation (as it appears the court here wanted to do), there is a way to do so without violating section 290.006. A trial court may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.