Kann

Epitech, Inc. v. Kann

Good Law
139 Cal. Rptr. 3d 702·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 427·204 Cal. App. 4th 1365·2012 WL 1255297
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 16, 2012No. B230197California2,875 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Croskey, J.

—As a corporation’s short-term secured debt obligations were soon to come due, it retained a financial advisor to enable it to obtain long-term financing which would, in part, enable it to pay off its short-term creditors. The financing was never obtained, and the corporation ultimately fell into bankruptcy. The corporation’s short-term creditors brought suit against the financial advisor, alleging that his fraudulent misrepresentations induced them to forbear from foreclosing on their security, to their ultimate financial detriment. The financial advisor filed a petition to compel arbitration, on the basis that the short-term creditors had been third party beneficiaries of the financial advisor’s contract with the corporation, which contained an arbitration clause. The trial court denied the motion and the financial advisor appeals. As the short-term creditors were not third party beneficiaries of the contract between the financial advisor and the corporation, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. Factual Background

This appeal arises from three consolidated lawsuits arising out of the ultimate failure of AutoLife Acquisition Corporation (AutoLife). AutoLife…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.