Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. County of Marin

Good Law
140 Cal. Rptr. 3d 290·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 458·205 Cal. App. 4th 195·2012 WL 1372191
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 20, 2012No. A133109California5,139 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pollak, J.

*199 Opinion

Can a public agency and a party disputing the adequacy of an environmental impact report (EIR) prepared in connection with the adoption of a general plan amendment effectively agree to toll the limitations period for filing a petition challenging the adequacy of the EIR? We agree with the trial court that they may do so and that the court properly sustained a demurrer to a complaint in intervention alleging the untimeliness of the petition that was later filed when the negotiations prompting the tolling agreements failed to produce a settlement.

Background

On September 14, 2010, Salmon Protection and Watershed Network (SPAWN) 1 filed a petition for a writ of mandate against the County of Marin and its board of supervisors (collectively, the county) alleging the EIR that the county certified in connection with the adoption of the Marin County wide General Plan update (Update) failed to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.). 2 The county certified the EIR and filed a notice of determination in compliance with section 21152, subdivision (a) and section 15094 of the CEQA guidelines (Cal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.