In re Pugh

Good Law
140 Cal. Rptr. 3d 194·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 467·205 Cal. App. 4th 260·2012 WL 967588
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2012No. C066229California6,442 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Blease, J.

Charged with first degree murder, William Jon Pugh was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced to 15 years to life plus two years. At the time of the murder in April 1986, Pugh was 18 years old. He spent the next 24 years in prison before being released at age 42 pending this appeal.

The Board of Parole Hearings (the Board) granted parole in October 2009. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger reversed the Board’s decision the next month. Pugh filed a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court, which was granted. The warden of the Deuel Vocational Institution where Pugh was housed at the time of the Board hearing filed this appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the writ.

We shall affirm the judgment of the trial court. Appellant argues Pugh’s current dangerousness is evidenced by his lack of insight into the offense *263 combined with the heinous nature of his crime. We find no evidence in the record that Pugh currently lacks insight into his offense. Furthermore, we find no evidence of any recent history of lack of insight. Appellant’s claim that the lack of insight makes the heinous nature of the crime probative to Pugh’s current dangerousness must,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.