San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Tomas L.

Good Law
140 Cal. Rptr. 3d 311·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 463·205 Cal. App. 4th 283·2012 WL 1402291
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 2012No. D060598California3,521 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McConnell, J.

Tomas L., a minor also involved in this dependency proceeding, appeals a judgment terminating parental rights over his younger half siblings, D.M. and Noah M., and selecting adoption as the preferred permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) 1 Tomas challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court’s findings of adoptability and the inapplicability of the sibling relationship exception to the adoption preference. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(l)(B)(v).) We conclude substantial evidence supports the court’s ruling on the sibling relationship exception. Further, as a matter of apparent first impression, we conclude Tomas lacks standing on the *287 adoptability finding because it does not affect any cognizable right of Tomas. We affirm the judgment, and dismiss the portion of the appeal pertaining to the issue of adoptability for lack of jurisdiction.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In September 2009 the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the Agency) removed D.M., then seven years of age, and her younger brother, Noah, from the custody of their mother, Erika R., and filed petitions on behalf of them under section 300. The petitions alleged the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.