Farag

Farag v. Arvinmeritor, Inc.

Good Law
140 Cal. Rptr. 3d 320·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 490·205 Cal. App. 4th 372·2012 WL 1403356
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 2012No. B233137California3,548 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Klein, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Nasseem Farag (Nasseem) and Sanna Farag (Sanna) (collectively, the Farags) appeal a postjudgment order denying their motion to tax expert witness costs sought by defendant and respondent ArvinMeritor, Inc. (ArvinMeritor), pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 after trial. 1 ’

The Farags contend a section 998 offer made jointly to a husband and wife is void.

Guided by Barnett v. First National Ins. Co. of America (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 1454 [ 110 Cal.Rptr.3d 99 ] (Barnett), we conclude a section 998 offer may be made jointly to spouses because, under California’s community property law, a cause of action for personal injury damages is community property (Fam. Code, § 780) and under Family Code section 1100, subdivision (a), either spouse has the power to accept the offer on behalf of the community. Therefore, the order is affirmed.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2009, Nasseem, a 58-year-old man, was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos exposure.

*375 Nasseem began working as a mechanic shortly after immigrating to the United States in 1981. Later, Nasseem purchased his own gas station in Ontario,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.