Abatti

Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation District

Good Law
140 Cal. Rptr. 3d 647·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 496·205 Cal. App. 4th 650·2012 WL 1434895·42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20098
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 2012No. D058329California10,961 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aaron, J.

*653 Opinion

I.

INTRODUCTION

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) 1 generally requires that a public agency prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) whenever the agency undertakes a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. (§§ 21100, 21151.) More specifically, “[i]f the agency’s initial study of a project produces substantial evidence supporting a fair argument the project may have significant adverse effects, the agency must (assuming the project is not exempt from CEQA) prepare an EIR.” (Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. (2010) 48 Cal.4th 310, 319 [ 106 Cal.Rptr.3d 502 , 226 P.3d 985 ].) If the agency determines by way of an initial study that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment, the agency may issue a negative declaration to this effect. (Ibid.; § 21064.)

Section 21166 provides that once an agency prepares an EIR, no EIR shall thereafter be required for the project unless certain statutorily prescribed circumstances occur, such as substantial changes to the project or to the circumstances under which the project is being…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.