Valenzuela

People v. Valenzuela

Good Law
141 Cal. Rptr. 3d 34·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 508·205 Cal. App. 4th 800·2012 WL 1478753
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 30, 2012No. B230574California3,381 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Willhite, J.

Defendant Joseph Marcus Valenzuela appeals from a judgment sentencing him to four years in state prison after a jury found him guilty *802 of one count of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, 1 § 496, subd. (a)) and three misdemeanor counts of identity theft (§ 530.5, subd. (c)(1)). Defendant challenges the admission of subpoenaed bank records of one of the identity theft victims, arguing that the jury may have believed that defendant hacked into the victim’s bank account. He also argues that his possession of the identifying information of three people at one time constitutes a single offense rather than three offenses and that, in any event, the sentence on one of those counts must be stayed under section 654 because it is based upon his possession of a driver’s license, which is the subject of the receiving stolen property count. Finally, he asks this court to examine the material the trial court reviewed during its in camera hearing on defendant’s Pitchess motion 2 to determine if all discoverable materials were ordered disclosed. We conclude the sentence in count 6 must be stayed, but otherwise affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

On May 23, 2010, while looking at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.