Larsen

People v. Larsen

Good Law
140 Cal. Rptr. 3d 762·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 513·205 Cal. App. 4th 810·2012 WL 1495423
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 30, 2012No. A128973California12,444 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dondero, J.

Defendant Chad Andrew Larsen was convicted following a jury trial of conspiracy to commit murder and solicitation to commit murder. The trial court sentenced him to 25 years to life for the conspiracy conviction, and a concurrent nine-year term for the solicitation conviction. He contends the trial court infringed on his constitutional right to present a defense by failing to give an instruction on mental disorder and intent, failed to give instructions on entrapment and the criminal liability of his coconspirator, and erred by denying his motion to recuse the entire prosecutor’s office prior to sentencing.

We conclude that the trial court committed error by refusing to give the CALCRIM No. 3428 instruction on evidence of mental disorder and intent. The instructional error was, however, not prejudicial. We find that no other errors were committed. We therefore affirm the judgment.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

In January of 2008, defendant was arrested and subsequently charged with felony violations of unlawful sexual intercourse and oral copulation with a minor (Pen. Code, §§ 261.5, subd. (c), 288a, subd. (b)(1)), 1 16-year-old Jane Doe. While defendant was held in the Humboldt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.