Sumner Hill Homeowners' Ass'n v. Rio Mesa Holdings, LLC

Good Law
141 Cal. Rptr. 3d 109·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 524·205 Cal. App. 4th 999·2012 WL 1530094
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 2, 2012No. F058617California16,637 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kane, J.

*1003 Opinion

For over two decades, homeowners at Sumner Hill, an isolated subdivision on bluffs overlooking the San Joaquin River, experienced the privacy of living in a remote, rural location within the confines of a security gate. They also enjoyed unrestricted access to the San Joaquin River on a dirt road within the subdivision known as Killkelly Road. Because Killkelly Road was inside the gated residential area, river access by that route was available to Sumner Hill homeowners but not the general public. The homeowners believed these amenities—a private, gated community and unrestricted river access—were part of what they purchased when they bought their lots in the subdivision. Eventually, however, the trajectory of future development reached that area and the homeowners’ status quo was challenged. A developer, Rio Mesa Holdings, LLC, purchased the surrounding land and announced plans for a large-scale suburban development that would include public access to the San Joaquin River directly through the Sumner Hill subdivision using Killkelly Road. The same party also installed a gate restricting the homeowners’ access to Killkelly Road. These events precipitated the present…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.