Dunn

People v. Dunn

Good Law
141 Cal. Rptr. 3d 193·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 545·205 Cal. App. 4th 1086·2012 WL 1571288
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 7, 2012No. D058407California6,207 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Irion, J.

Robin Andrew Dunn appeals the judgment sentencing him to prison after a jury found him guilty of committing sex crimes against an eight-year-old relative and infecting her with syphilis. Dunn contends the judgment must be reversed because (1) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for mistrial, which was based upon the failure of his retained expert witness to appear at trial and (2) trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to subpoena the expert witness to appear at trial. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment.

I

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. Dunn’s Molestation of Minor

In the summer of 2007, Dunn and a relative who was eight years old at the time (hereafter Minor) lived in an apartment with Dunn’s girlfriend, Ava Loftis. Several relatives of Loftis also lived in the apartment.

*1089 One night, while Loftis was at work, Minor watched a movie with Dunn in the master bedroom and then went to sleep on the floor. Dunn picked Minor up from the floor, laid her supine on the bed, removed her pajama bottoms and underwear, and lowered his own underwear. Then, in the words of Minor, Dunn got “on top of [her],” “humped” her, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.