Rezek

Rezek v. Superior Court

Good Law
141 Cal. Rptr. 3d 891·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 630·206 Cal. App. 4th 633·2012 WL 1890195
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 2012No. G044915California3,242 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Moore, J.

Are statements of witnesses to the crime with which the defendant is charged immune from discovery because the statements were obtained as the result of an internal affairs investigation and placed in an officer’s personnel file? No. A defendant may obtain the statements on a showing of good cause made in a motion brought pursuant to and not precluded under Evidence Code sections 1043 and 1045. We direct the trial court to review the internal affairs report concerning defendant’s complaint in camera and to disclose to defendant the relevant nonprecluded statements of percipient witnesses to the charged incident.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant Edward Rezek is charged in Orange County Superior Court case No. 10CM00225 with one misdemeanor count each of delaying or obstructing a police officer in the performance of his duty (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)) and vandalism (Pen. Code, § 594, subd. (a)). It appears the prosecution theory is defendant punched a motor vehicle driven by a private security guard in a crosswalk at a shopping center in Tustin, causing damage to the vehicle. The security guard, Jose Reyes, then made a citizen’s arrest of *638…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.