Bowers

Bowers v. Raymond J. Lucia Companies

Good Law
142 Cal. Rptr. 3d 64·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 635·206 Cal. App. 4th 724·2012 WL 1939722
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 30, 2012No. D059333California4,035 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McConnel, J.

*728 Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Raymond J. Lucia Companies, Inc. (defendant), appeals from a judgment enforcing a settlement agreement resulting in a binding mediation award in favor of Ryan N. Bowers, Marc Seward, and Jeffrey LaBerge (plaintiffs). Defendant contends we must reverse the judgment as the underlying settlement agreement is unenforceable because (1) defendant never agreed to resolve the parties’ dispute through binding mediation; (2) a contract term providing for binding mediation is necessarily too uncertain to be enforceable; and (3) binding mediation is not among the constitutionally and statutorily permissible means of waiving jury trial rights. We conclude there is substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determination defendant agreed to the binding mediation procedure utilized in this case. We further conclude that the binding mediation provisions in the parties’ settlement agreement were not too uncertain to be enforceable. Finally, we conclude binding mediation is not a constitutionally or statutorily prohibited means of waiving jury trial rights where, as here, the parties have agreed to settle their dispute in a nonjudicial forum. We, therefore, affirm…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.