Cole

Cole v. Patricia a. Meyer & Associates, APC

Bad Law
206 Cal. App. 4th 1095·12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6394
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 2012No. B227712; No. B230271California10,686 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Epstein, J.

This case involves causes of action for malicious prosecution and defamation against attorneys of record in a prior case. As to the causes of action for malicious prosecution, we hold, among other things, that the attorneys’ anti-SLAPP 1 special motions to strike (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.) were improperly granted, and that attorneys who appear on all of the pleadings and papers filed for the plaintiffs in the underlying case cannot avoid liability for malicious prosecution merely by showing that they took a passive role in that case as standby counsel who would try the case in the event it went to trial.

Christopher A. Cole filed a complaint for malicious prosecution and defamation against the following defendants: Patricia A. Meyer & Associates, APC (formerly known as Aguirre & Meyer, hereafter Meyer & Associates), Patricia A. Meyer and Michael Aguirre (collectively the Meyer defendants); *1101 Kiesel, Boucher, & Larson, and Raymond P. Boucher (collectively the Boucher defendants); and Robert P. Ottilie. Defendants were the attorneys of record for plaintiffs in a prior shareholder action against Cole and other directors of Peregrine Systems, Inc. (Peregrine), a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.