Hoover

Hoover v. American Income Life Insurance

Good Law
142 Cal. Rptr. 3d 312·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 687·206 Cal. App. 4th 1193·2012 WL 2126892
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 16, 2012No. E052864California5,396 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Codrington, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

Martha Hoover, plaintiff and respondent, worked as a sales agent for about four months for American Income Life Insurance Company (AIL), defendant and appellant. ALL appeals from an order denying its petition to compel arbitration of Hoover’s civil action based on various Labor Code statutes. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1294, subd. (a).)

The underlying issue, which we do not resolve in this appeal, concerns whether Hoover was an employee of AIL or an independent contractor. She claims she was an employee, entitled to receive minimum wage, as well as reimbursement for work-related expenses and prompt payment of earned wages due upon termination. (Lab. Code, §§ 203, 1194, 2802.) 1 Hoover further contends her statutory labor claims are not subject to arbitration.

*1198 In opposition, AIL counters that Hoover was an independent contractor who was not entitled as an employee to receive minimum wage, reimbursement, or earned wages. Nevertheless, AIL contends Hoover’s statutory labor claims are subject to arbitration as provided in the agent contract, as incorporated by the collective bargaining agreement (CBA).

We disagree with AIL. If Hoover was an employee with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.