Sandler

Sandler v. Sanchez

Good Law
142 Cal. Rptr. 3d 771·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 713·206 Cal. App. 4th 1431·2012 WL 2226501
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 18, 2012No. B232571California5,408 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Perluss, J.

Business and Professions Code section 10159.2 1 makes a licensed individual real estate broker who is the designated officer of a corporate broker “responsible for the supervision and control” of the corporate broker’s employees. Can a designated officer’s failure to supervise a corporate employee, without more, subject the officer to direct personal liability to third parties for harm caused by his or her failure to supervise? Apart from the officer’s direct liability, can the designated officer be held vicariously liable under traditional agency principles for the tortious conduct of the corporate employees he or she is responsible for supervising?

The designated officer’s duty to supervise codified in section 10159.2 is owed to the corporation, not to third parties. Accordingly, breach of that statute is grounds for administrative discipline against the designated officer by the licensing entity and perhaps an action by the corporation for indemnification, but not an action by third parties. Moreover, whether or not a designated officer may be, under traditional agency principles, vicariously liable for the tortious conduct of the employees he or she supervises in an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.