Pierce

Pierce v. Western Surety Co.

Good Law
143 Cal. Rptr. 3d 152·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 734·207 Cal. App. 4th 83·2012 WL 2362579
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 22, 2012No. F062096California3,034 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kane, J.

Vehicle Code 1 section 11710 requires a licensed motor vehicle retail dealer to procure and file a bond in the amount of $50,000. Any person who suffers a loss by reason of the dealer’s fraud has a right of action against the dealer and the surety on the bond in an amount not to exceed the value of the vehicle purchased. (§ 11711, subd. (a).)

Here, respondent Trenton Pierce made a section 11711 claim on the bond issued by appellant Western Surety Company (Western Surety) to Autorama, a licensed dealer. Western Surety eventually settled with Pierce. Thereafter, the trial court awarded attorney fees to Pierce. The court concluded that Autorama would have been liable for attorney fees if Pierce had successfully sued it on the contract and therefore Western Surety was also liable for *87 attorney fees. The court further found that the claims Pierce made under various consumer protection statutes also entitled him to attorney fees from Western Surety.

Western Surety challenges the attorney fees award. Western Surety argues that, because section 11711 does not specifically authorize attorney fees, Pierce is not entitled to such fees by statute. Western Surety further contends…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.