LaChance

LaChance v. Valverde

Good Law
143 Cal. Rptr. 3d 703·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 788·207 Cal. App. 4th 779·2012 WL 2631925
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 18, 2012No. G045332California3,637 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fybel, J.

Introduction

Misty Lynn LaChance pled guilty to driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), and the Department of Motor Vehicles (the DMV) suspended her driver’s license for six months, pursuant to Vehicle Code section 13352, subdivision (a)(1). (All further statutory references are to the Vehicle Code, *782 unless otherwise specified.) This suspension was imposed concurrently with a one-year administrative per se (APS) suspension imposed by the DMV in connection with the same DUI incident.

LaChance requested that the DMV issue her a restricted driver’s license during the term of her suspension, pursuant to section 13352, subdivision (a)(3). The DMV denied the request because subdivision (a)(3) of section 13352 only applies to drivers who have been convicted of DUI on more than one occasion; although LaChance had been arrested for DUI once previously, she had never before been convicted of DUI.

The trial court granted LaChance’s petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus, ordering the DMV to issue LaChance a restricted driver’s license pursuant to section 13352, subdivision (a)(3). We reverse the judgment, because the unambiguous language of section 13352,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.