Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc.

Bad Law
144 Cal. Rptr. 3d 12·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 807·207 Cal. App. 4th 969·2012 WL 2866421
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 2012No. B232771California4,233 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chaney, J.

Plaintiff and respondent, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (Travelers), filed this action for declaratory relief seeking a *972 determination that there was no potential for coverage under its policy, and therefore no duty to defend its insureds, Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc., Charlotte Russe Merchandising, Inc., David Mussafer, Jenny J. Ming, Advent International Corporation, Advent CR Holdings, Inc., and Advent CR, Inc. (the Charlotte Russe parties), in litigation against them by Versatile Entertainment, Inc., and its parent, People’s Liberation, Inc. (collectively, Versatile). The trial court agreed with Travelers, and granted its motion for summary judgment. We will reverse the summary judgment.

BACKGROUND

Underlying lawsuits by Versatile against the Charlotte Russe parties

The underlying litigation for which the Charlotte Russe parties sought coverage arises out of pleadings filed by Versatile in litigation against the Charlotte Russe parties. On October 26, 2009, certain of the Charlotte Russe parties sued Versatile alleging claims for fraud, breach of contract, and restitution. On October 27, 2009, Versatile filed an action against those parties,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.