Michael Leslie Productions, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
144 Cal. Rptr. 3d 22·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 811·207 Cal. App. 4th 1011·2012 WL 2877708
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 2012No. B233052California5,915 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Grimes, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Michael Leslie Productions, Inc., doing business as Ready Golf Centers (Ready Golf), appeals from the judgment of dismissal entered by the trial court following the sustaining of die demurrer of defendant and respondent City of Los Angeles (City) to Ready Golf’s original complaint without leave to amend. Ready Golf contends it stated a valid claim entitling it to relief by writ of mandate, and that even if there were defects in its original pleading, the trial court abused its discretion in refusing Ready Golf at least one opportunity to amend. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The City operates seven public golf courses through its department of recreation and parks (Department): two courses at the Sepulveda Golf Complex, two courses at Griffith Park, the Hansen Dam golf course, the Rancho Park golf course, and the Woodley Lakes golf course. Almost 500 golf carts, on average, are in operation at the City’s golf courses on any given day. In 2007, the golf cart concession at the City’s golf courses was handled by a private entity, J.H. Kishi Company (Kishi). Kishi had operated the concession for a number of years under a written…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.