Wohlgemuth

Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.

Good Law
144 Cal. Rptr. 3d 545·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 831·207 Cal. App. 4th 1252·2012 WL 2989811
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 2012No. F061981California4,255 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kane, J.

*1256 Opinion

Plaintiffs Richard L. Wohlgemuth and Gloria M. Wohlgemuth purchased a new motor home that had an engine manufactured and warranted by defendant Caterpillar Inc. Plaintiffs subsequently claimed the engine was defective and sued defendant under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, 1 § 1790 et seq.; Song-Beverly Act), alleging that defendant failed to repair the defects after a reasonable number of attempts. Shortly before trial, defendant made a Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offer to compromise. The offer provided that plaintiffs would be paid $50,000, in exchange for which plaintiffs would dismiss the action with prejudice and sign a release of all claims. The offer was silent as to attorney fees and costs. Plaintiffs filed a notice of acceptance of the offer, dismissed the action with prejudice and then moved to recover their attorney fees and costs under section 1794, subdivision (d) (section 1794(d)). Defendant opposed the motion, arguing that there was no formal judgment in plaintiffs’ favor as a predicate for an attorney fee or cost award and that, in any event, defendant was the true prevailing party, not plaintiffs, since a dismissal had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.