Arias

Arias v. Kardoulias

Good Law
144 Cal. Rptr. 3d 599·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 838·207 Cal. App. 4th 1429·2012 WL 3039170·19 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1110
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 26, 2012No. B234263California2,959 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aldrich, J.

*1433 Opinion

Labor Code section 98.2, subdivision (c) 1 states that if a party files an appeal in the superior court seeking review of California’s Labor Commissioner’s (commissioner) decision and is “unsuccessful in the appeal,” the court shall determine the reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred by the other parties to the appeal and assess that amount as a cost upon the party filing the appeal. “An employee is successful [on appeal] if the court awards an amount greater than zero.” (§ 98.2, subd. (c).) The commissioner awarded Rebecca C. Arias $6,319.69 in unpaid wages, but her untimely appeal to the superior court was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds. The superior court considered Arias “unsuccessful on appeal,” and assessed $6,395 in attorney fees and costs against Arias, the party filing the appeal.

In this case of first impression, we must determine whether the dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of an untimely appeal from the commissioner’s decision is equivalent to an “award of zero” for purposes of assessing attorney fees and costs against an unsuccessful employee under section 98.2, subdivision (c). Unlike a conventional case, when a party timely appeals the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.