Rodriguez

People v. Rodriguez

Good Law
145 Cal. Rptr. 3d 20·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 841·207 Cal. App. 4th 1540·2012 WL 3065548
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2012No. B234642California1,430 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Yegan, J.

*1542 Opinion

The movies glorify instances of suspected criminals attempting to avoid detention and arrest. In the movies, they often succeed in the wake of inept police officers. But in real life, the suspects rarely succeed. Their conduct poses a danger to the police, the suspect, and innocent bystanders. Here, appellant’s attempt to avoid apprehension did not succeed and resulted in injury to the officer. It could have easily been worse. Any attempt by a suspect to gain control of an officer’s firearm is the acme of foolishness. Had appellant succeeded, responding officers would have had justifiable concern for their own safety and a gun battle could have easily erupted.

Jose Luis Rodriguez appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of deterring, preventing, or resisting an officer by force and violence. (Pen. Code, § 69.) 1 Appellant admitted two prior prison term enhancements (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) and was found in violation of probation in another case (case No. 2007006324). The trial court sentenced him to four years in state prison. He appeals contending that the evidence is insufficient to support the element of the offense that the officer was in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.