Reinoso

Axis Surplus Insurance v. Reinoso

Good Law
145 Cal. Rptr. 3d 128·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 858·208 Cal. App. 4th 181·2012 WL 3143907
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 3, 2012No. B228332California5,801 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mosk, J.

INTRODUCTION

We hold there is substantial evidence to support the finding that appellant was not covered by liability insurance in connection with claims brought against her by tenants of an apartment building that she co-owned. We also hold that in connection with the insurer’s action against appellant and others to recover the costs of settling those claims, there is substantial evidence to support the trial court’s implied allocation to appellant of joint and several liability to the insurer for the amount of the settlement costs paid by the insurer. The benefit to appellant of the settlement justified such an allocation. We therefore affirm the judgment.

*184 BACKGROUND

Defendant and appellant Linda Reinoso and her husband Edgar Reinoso, owned and managed about 15 rental properties in the City of Palmdale. 2 Proud American Investments, LLC (Proud American), the Reinosos’ management company, managed the properties. The Reinosos also owned another 64 rental properties elsewhere in Southern California. During the 30 years prior to trial, the Reinosos had owned, operated, and managed an additional 35 properties.

In 2001, Edgar pleaded no contest in People v. Reinoso…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.