Hansen

Hansen v. Board of Registered Nursing

Good Law
145 Cal. Rptr. 3d 739·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 885·208 Cal. App. 4th 664·2012 WL 3516478
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 16, 2012No. D060622California3,850 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Irion, J.

Kim Rachel Hansen filed a petition for writ of administrative mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) to challenge the decision of the Board of Registered Nursing (the Board) to revoke her registered nurse license (hereafter license). On the Board’s demurrer, the trial court ruled the petition was untimely; and after Hansen did not amend within the time allotted, the court entered a judgment dismissing the petition with prejudice.

Hansen appeals, contending she did not learn of the revocation until after the limitations period for filing the petition had expired. We affirm.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Hansen obtained a license from the Board in 1987. During a hospitalization in 2009, she spoke to a representative of the Board and agreed to participate in a diversion program for nurses and other professionals having problems with alcohol consumption. Hansen, however, refused to enroll in the program.

Following her refusal to participate in the diversion program, the Board filed an accusation against Hansen charging her with unprofessional conduct and seeking suspension or revocation of her license. The Board alleged Hansen engaged in unprofessional conduct by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.