Robertson

People v. Robertson

Bad Law
146 Cal. Rptr. 3d 66·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 898·208 Cal. App. 4th 965·2012 WL 3569703·12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9570
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 21, 2012No. F061058California11,724 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Levy, J.

INTRODUCTION

On October 12, 2009, 1 appellant Roger Wayne Robertson kidnapped and sexually assaulted M.H. (the victim). He was convicted after jury trial of aggravated kidnapping for the purpose of committing rape (count 1), sexual penetration by a foreign object (count 2) and forcible rape (count 3). (Pen. Code, §§ 209, subd. (b)(1), 289, subd. (a)(1), 261, subd. (a)(2).) 2 The jury *971 found true a special finding attached to counts 2 and 3 that appellant kidnapped the victim “in violation of Penal Code Section 207 or 209, pursuant to Penal Code Section 667.61(e)(1)” (special finding No. 2). (§ 667.61, subd. (e)(1).) The jury acquitted appellant of a second forcible rape count and of dissuading a witness from reporting a crime (counts 4 and 5). (§§ 261, subd. (a)(2), 136.1, subd. (b)(1).) The jury found not true a special finding that appellant kidnapped the victim, “and the movement of the victim substantially increased the risk of harm to the victim over and above that level of the risk necessarily inherent in the underlying offense in Penal Code Section 667.61, subdivision (c), pursuant to Penal Code Section 667.61(d)(2)” (special finding No. 1).

Appellant was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.