Cuellar

People v. Cuellar

Good Law
145 Cal. Rptr. 3d 898·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 907·208 Cal. App. 4th 1067·2012 WL 3594270
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 22, 2012No. B233089California1,219 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Epstein, J.

Alvaro Cuellar was charged and convicted of a violation of Penal Code section 288.5, subdivision (a) (lewd and lascivious acts with a child under 14 with whom the defendant resided; the “continuous sexual child molester” statute). He presents two contentions on appeal: that the trial court erroneously denied his request to self-represent at trial, and that the pattern instruction for the offense, CALCRIM No. 1120, is infirm because it negates one of the elements of the crime. In the nonpublished portion of the opinion we conclude the trial court was within its discretion in denying the request for self-representation because it came too late in the proceedings. In the published portion of the opinion we conclude that while the pattern instruction is problematic, any deficiencies it may have were harmless in this case in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt. We suggest a modification of the instruction to obviate the problematic aspect. We shall affirm the conviction.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY*

DISCUSSION

I *

II

As pertinent here, the statute under which defendant was charged, Penal Code section 288.5, subdivision (a), applies to a person…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.