Bell v. H.F. Cox, Inc.

Good Law
146 Cal. Rptr. 3d 723·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 951·209 Cal. App. 4th 62·2012 WL 3846827
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 2012Nos. B229982, B233136California7,830 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Croskey, J.

Oscar Bell and other truck drivers filed a class action complaint against H.F. Cox, Inc. (Cox), alleging wage and hour violations. 1 The trial court summarily adjudicated three counts in favor of Cox, a jury found in favor of Cox on another count and the trial court found that plaintiffs were exempt from federal overtime compensation requirements. Plaintiffs appeal the judgment challenging the order granting summary adjudication, the denial of their motion to exclude witnesses from testifying at trial, the court’s finding on the overtime exemption and the jury instructions. Plaintiffs also appeal an order awarding attorney fees to Cox as the prevailing party on certain counts.

We conclude that (1) summary adjudication was proper as to the count for failure to pay promised vacation benefits to current employees but improper as to the count for failure to pay vacation benefits due upon termination of employment; (2) the denial of plaintiffs’ motion to exclude witnesses from testifying at trial was proper; (3) the finding that plaintiffs were exempt from federal overtime compensation requirements pursuant to the motor carrier exemption was proper; (4) plaintiffs have shown…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.