Orozco

People v. Orozco

Good Law
146 Cal. Rptr. 3d 916·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 1011·209 Cal. App. 4th 726·2012 WL 4356217
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2012No. G045124California3,123 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ikola, J.

Defendant James Orozco pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine and driving under the influence of alcohol. The court sentenced him to 60 *729 days in jail and three years of probation for driving under the influence of alcohol, but granted him deferred entry of judgment under Penal Code section 1000 et seq. for possessing cocaine. 1 To satisfy the deferred entry of judgment requirements, defendant enrolled in, but was eventually terminated from, a section 1000 drug treatment program. He moved to be reinstated in the program. The court (a different judge) denied defendant’s motion on two alternative grounds: (1) defendant’s drunk driving violation rendered him ineligible under section 1000, subdivision (a)(3) (section 1000(a)(3)) for deferred entry of judgment on the cocaine possession charge and (2) defendant had performed unsatisfactorily in the drug treatment program by failing too long to enroll and participate in a timely way.

We hold the court misinterpreted section 1000(a)(3). That subdivision disqualifies a defendant for deferred entry of judgment if he or she has committed (in addition to the crime eligible for deferred entry of judgment) an ineligible offense…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.