Dutra

Dutra v. Mercy Medical Center Mt. Shasta

Good Law
146 Cal. Rptr. 3d 922·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 1013·209 Cal. App. 4th 750·2012 WL 4389528·77 Cal. Comp. Cases 851
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2012No. C067169California1,547 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nicholson, J.

*753 Opinion

Plaintiff Michelle Dutra sued her former employer, defendant Mercy Medical Center Mt. Shasta (Mercy), for defamation and wrongful termination in violation of public policy. Plaintiff alleged Mercy committed libel per se by communicating to her and others in a private meeting its grounds for terminating her employment. She alleged Mercy discharged her in violation of the public policy codified at Labor Code section 132a, which generally prohibits discharging an employee for filing a workers’ compensation claim.

The trial court granted Mercy’s motion for summary adjudication against the defamation cause of action. It concluded Mercy’s communicating its grounds for terminating plaintiff was a conditionally privileged communication under Civil Code section 47, subdivision (c), and that plaintiff had failed to introduce triable issues of material fact that would defeat the privilege, including showing the publication was motivated by malice.

After selecting the jury for trial on the remaining wrongful termination cause of action, the court granted Mercy’s motion to dismiss the action on the ground the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has exclusive jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.